Biological and chemical control of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) pests under conditions of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2025.28.04.09

Keywords:

adaptive strategy, harmfulness, varietal resistance, infestation level, Agromyzidae, Bruchus pisorum, Delia platura, Helicoverpa armigera

Abstract

Chickpea is a strategically important pulse crop, the expansion of its acreage being constrained by a complex of pests whose harmfulness intensity significantly increases under conditions of global climate change and increased hydrothermal stress. The aim of the study was to investigate the population dynamics of key chickpea phytophages and to evaluate the effectiveness of biological and chemical protection systems on the Zekhavit and Kira varieties. Field studies were conducted on experimental plots in the Myrhorod district of the Poltava region during 2023–2024. The objects of the study were two chickpea varieties: Zekhavit and Kira. The subject of the research covered the dynamics of spread, species composition, and the degree of harmfulness of the phytophage complex, as well as the comparative effectiveness of biological and chemical insecticidal protection schemes. It was established that in the extremely droughty year of 2024, the total plant infestation index on the control variants increased by 26–28 % compared to 2023. This increase was directly caused by a significant rise in the population of dominant pests such as the leaf miner fly, thrips, and moths. A comparison of the varieties revealed that the Kira variety demonstrated higher natural resistance to the pest complex compared to the Zekhavit variety in the unprotected plots. However, the application of any protection measures, particularly the chemical ones, leveled the detected varietal differences, indicating the dominant influence of the protection system over varietal characteristics in years of high risk. The biological scheme, based on the use of entomopathogenic agents, provided an average reduction in the total infestation index by 44–46 %. Its effectiveness was sufficient against leaf miner flies, thrips, and moths, but its overall performance noticeably decreased during droughty periods due to unfavorable conditions for the viability and reproduction of biological agents. The chemical protection scheme demonstrated the highest stability and effectiveness, achieving a reduction in the infestation level by 72–74 % regardless of the variety and agro-climatic conditions. The obtained results highlight the strategic necessity of transitioning to an adaptive chickpea protection system, in which biological agents are recommended under moderate pest pressure, while the timely use of chemical insecticides is necessary to stabilize yields and combating extreme outbreaks of harmfulness under moisture-deficit conditions.

References

Chernik, I. V., & Tryhuba, O. V. (2023). Common chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) – A prospective legume culture of the Western Forest Steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Issue Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Biology, 83 (3–4), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.23.3-4.13

Chaika, T., Lohvynenko, V., & Pshenyshnyi, A. (2023). The impact of soil tillage systems on soybean yield capacity. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 26 (4), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2023.26.04.10

Patil, S. B., Goyal, A., Chitgupekar, S. S., Kumar, S., & El-Bouhssini, M. (2017). Sustainable management of chickpea pod borer. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0428-8

Bajya, D. R., Ranjith, M., & Raza, S. K. (2015). Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana against chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera and its safety to natural enemies. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85 (3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i3.47122

Kumari, N., & Malik, D. (2024). Status, growth and variability of chickpea production in India. Agricultural Science Digest. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-6065

Singh, K. A., Yadav, K. D., Vishwakarma, A., Gourav, K. B., & Dwivedi, P. (2025). Eco-friendly management of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 20 (2), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2025.20.2.20

Kanouni, H., Ahari, S. D., & Khoshro, H. H. (2018). Chickpea research and production in Iran. 7th International Food Legume Research Conference (IFLRC-VII). Marrakech, Morocco.

Adamenko, T. (2006). Zmina agroklimatychnyh umov ta ih vplyv na zernove gospodarstvo. Agronom, 3, 12–15 [in Ukrainian]

Chernik, I. V., & Tryhuba, O. V. (2023). Nut zvychainyi (Cicer arietinum L.) – perspektyvnabobova kultura zakhidnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy. Naukovi Zapysky TNPU. Seriia: Biolohiia, 83 (3–4), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.23.3–4.13 [in Ukrainian]

Drobitko, A., Kachanova, T., Markova, N., Manushkina, T., & Tarabrina, A.-M. (2024). Aspects of legume growth in Ukraine. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 28 (2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/2.2024.09

Pysarenko, V. M., Pysarenko, P. V., Pysarenko, V. V., Gorb, O. O., & Chaіka T. O. (2019). Droughts in the context of climate changes in Ukraine. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 1, 134–146. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2019.01.18

Melnyk, A. V., Romanko, Yu. O., Brunov, M. I., Sorokolit, Ye. M., & Kubrak, T. M. (2020). Rist ta rozvytok nutu v umovakh pivnichno-skhidnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy. Visnyk Sumskoho Natsionalnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu, 2 (40), 38–46 [in Ukrainian]

Chandrashekar, K., Gupta, O., Yelshetty, S., Sharma, O. P., Bhagat, S., Chattopadhyay, C., Sehgal, M., Kumari, A., Amaresan, N., Sushil, S. N., Sinha, A. K., Asre, R., Kapoor, K. S., Satyagopal, K., & Jeyakumar, P. (2014). Integrated Pest Management for Chickpea (pp. 43). Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine & Storage; National Centre for Integrated Pest Management. Retrieved from https://niphm.gov.in/IPMPackages/Chickpea.pdf

El Fakhouri, K., Boulamtat, R., Sabraoui, A., & El Bouhssini, M. (2022). The chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner): Yield loss estimation and biorational insecticide assessment in Morocco. Agronomy, 12 (12), 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123017

Chouhan, S. S., Tomar, R. K. S., Awasthi, A. K., Kerketta, A., Pandey, D., & Chaure, N. K. (2023). To evaluate the bioefficacy of different biopesticides and insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) at Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). The Pharma Innovation Journal, SP-12 (8), 431–435.

Akhtar, M., Mahmood, M. T., Khalid, M. J., Amin, A., Zafar, M. N., Aziz, A., Rasool, I., & Qadeer, Z. (2022). Efficacy of some new chemistry insecticides against the chickpea pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) [Hubner]. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, 23 (9–10), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56557/pcbmb/2022/v23i9-107479

Ahmed, K., & Awan, M. S. (2013). Integrated management of insect pests of chickpea Cicer arietinum (L. Walp) in South Asian countries: Present status and future strategies – A review. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 45 (4), 1125–1145.

Singh, A., & Tayde, A. R. (2023). Determining the effect of biopesticides and chemicals against pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (L.)] on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35 (18), 1971–1976. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183481

Stavrakaki, M., Ilias, A., Simoglou, K. B., Mironidis, G. K., Zimmer, C. T., Souza, D., & Roditakis, E. (2024). Revision of Helicoverpa armigera insecticide resistance status in Greece. Crop Protection, 175, 106446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106446

Ravicharan, C., & Tayde, A. R. (2023). Field efficacy of selected insecticides against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (H.) in chick pea (Cicer arietinum Linnaeus). Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15 (6), 220–223.

Saeedi, G. D., Sediqi, A. N., & Niazyar, A. (2023). Effect of some chemical and biorational compounds against chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 3 (2), 1022–1025.

Kalenska, S. M., Yermakova, L. M., & Palamarchuk, V. D. (2015). Systemy suchasnykh intensyvnykh tekhnolohii u roslynnytstvi. Vinnytsia: Rohalska I. O. [in Ukrainian]

BINITRO NUT. (n.d.). ENZIM Agro. Retrieved from: https://agro.enzim.biz/docs/preparat/binitro-nut.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Koval, I. M., & Bräuning, A. (2024). The effect of climate change on the radial growth of Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus robur L. in the stands of Kharkiv green zone. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, 41, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4224-2024-41-10

Pysarenko, V. M., Pishchalenko, M. A., Horb, O. O., Pospielova, H. D., Kovalenko, N. P., & Sherstiuk, O. L. (2020). Intehrovanyi zakhyst roslyn. Poltava [in Ukrainian]

Koul, B., Sharma, K., Sehgal, V., Yadav, D., Mishra, M., & Bharadwaj, C. (2022). Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) biology and biotechnology: From domestication to biofortification and biopharming. Plants, 11 (21), 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212926

Chitralekha, Yadav, G. S., & Verma, T. (2018). Efficacy of insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6 (3), 1058–1061.

Barwa, J., & Kumar, A. (2022). Field efficacy of chlorantraniliprole with some biopesticides against pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal, SP-11 (6), 1912–1916.

Rijal, J. P., GC, Y. D., Thapa, R. B., & Kafle, L. (2008). Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana against Helicoverpa armigera in Chickpea, under Field Conditions in Nepal. Formosan Entomologist, 28, 249–258.

Younas, A., Wakil, W., Khan, Z., Shaaban, M., & Prager, S. M. (2017). The efficacy of Beauveria bassiana, jasmonic acid and chlorantraniliprole on larval populations of Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea crop ecosystems. Pest Management Science, 73 (2), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4297

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Shuleshchenko, V. (2025). Biological and chemical control of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) pests under conditions of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 28(4), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2025.28.04.09

Issue

Section

AGRICULTURE. PLANT CULTIVATION