Integrated assessment of the reproductive performance of ewes of different genetic origins considering animal welfare indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2026.29.02.05Keywords:
Dorper, Merinoland, Romanov sheep, crossbreeds, reproduction, prolificacy, animal welfareAbstract
The article investigates the peculiarities of reproductive performance formation in ewes of different genetic origins under modern intensive sheep production systems. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to improve flock reproductive efficiency through the combination of genetic resources, the enhancement of breeding strategies, and the consideration of animal welfare indicators. It was established that genetic origin significantly affects fertility, prolificacy, and lamb output. Crossbred genotypes Dorper × Romanov and Merinoland × Romanov outperformed purebred Dorper sheep in most reproductive traits, demonstrating the manifestation of heterosis effects. The highest fertility rate (92.3 %) was recorded in the Dorper × Romanov group, whereas the greatest prolificacy (161.1 %) was observed in Merinoland × Romanov ewes. The results showed that crossbred animals were characterized by higher milk production (5.7–9.6 % increase), lower incidence of diseases and stress load, and better behavioral activity indicators, suggesting a higher level of animal welfare. At the same time, the highest lamb survival rate was observed in purebred Dorper ewes (90.9 %), whereas a slight decrease was recorded in crossbred groups due to their increased prolificacy. The Integrated Reproductive Ability Index (RAI) in the experimental groups ranged from 0.73 to 0.91 conventional units. The highest values were obtained in the Merinoland × Romanov group (+24.7 % compared with Dorper), indicating the most complete realization of genetic complementarity and an optimal balance between productivity and adaptability. The scientific novelty of the study lies in substantiating a systematic approach to evaluating reproductive performance based on the integration of genetic, productive, and animal welfare indicators. Therefore, the proposed Integrated Reproductive Ability Index (RAI) provides a comprehensive evaluation by combining fertility, prolificacy, lamb survival, milk production, and animal welfare indicators into a single integrated criterion. It can be recommended as an additional selection criterion for identifying breeding ewes with high reproductive efficiency and adaptive potential. The practical application of the Integrated Reproductive Ability Index (RAI) enhances the objectivity of breeding genotype selection, optimizes breeding programmes and flock reproduction, and contributes to the implementation of sustainable sheep production in accordance with the principles of the Animal Welfare, One Welfare, and One Health concepts.
References
1. Kramarenko, A. S., Kramarenko, S. S., Lugovoy, S. I., & Havryliuk, K. I. (2020). Influence of genetic and non-genetic factors on the reproductive traits in ewes. Taurian Scientific Herald, 114, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.32851/2226-0099.2020.114.22
2. Areb, E., Getachew, T., Kirmani, M., G.silase, T., & Haile, A. (2021). Estimation of co-variance components, genetic parameters, and genetic trends of reproductive traits in community-based breeding program of Bonga sheep in Ethiopia. Animal Bioscience, 34(9), 1451–1459. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0413
3. Mura, M. C., Luridiana, S., Bodano, S., Daga, C., Cosso, G., Diaz, M. L., Bini, P. P., & Carcangiu, V. (2014). Influence of melatonin receptor 1A gene polymorphisms on seasonal reproduction in Sarda ewes with different body condition scores and ages. Animal Reproduction Science, 149(3-4), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.07.022
4. Montgomery, G. W. (2024). Genetic regulation of ovulation rate and multiple births. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 36(14), RD24083. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd24083
5. Zufferey, R., Minnig, A., Thomann, B., Zwygart, S., Keil, N., Schüpbach, G., Miserez, R., Zanolari, P., & Stucki, D. (2021). Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment in sheep. Animals, 11(10), 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102973
6. Eteqadi, B., Hossein-Zadeh, N. G., & Shadparvar, A. A. (2017). Genetic analysis of basic and composite reproduction traits in Guilan sheep. Annals of Animal Science, 17(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0016
7. Santos, B. F. S., van der Werf, J. H. J., Gibson, J. P., Byrne, T. J., & Amer, P. R. (2017). Genetic and economic benefits of selection based on performance recording and genotyping in lower tiers of multi-tiered sheep breeding schemes. Genetics Selection Evolution, 49(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0281-2
8. Notter, D. (2008). Genetic aspects of reproduction in sheep. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 43(s2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01151.x
9. Zhulinska, O. S., & Lobachova, I. V. (2020). Correction of ewes’ reproductive function in the early postpartum period. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 4, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2020.04.25
10. Safari, E., Fogarty, N. M., Gilmour, A. R., Atkins, K. D., Mortimer, S. I., Swan, A. A., Brien, F. D., Greeff, J. C., & van der Werf, J. H. J. (2007). Across population genetic parameters for wool, growth, and reproduction traits in Australian Merino sheep. 2. Estimates of heritability and variance components. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 58(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1071/ar06162
11. Fogarty, N. M., & Mulholland, J. G. (2013). Seasonal reproductive performance of crossbred ewes in intensive lamb-production systems. Animal Production Science, 54(6), 791–801. https://doi.org/10.1071/an12434
12. Hameed Ajafar, M., Hasan Kadhim, A., & Mohammed AL-Thuwaini, T. (2022). The reproductive traits of sheep and their influencing factors. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 10(0), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.10.0_82
13. Lesnovska, O. V. (2015). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti ovets riznykh henotypiv [Reproductive qualities of ewes of different genotypes]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Naukovo-Doslidnoho Tsentru Biobezpeky ta Ekolohichnoho Kontroliu Resursiv APK Dnipropetrovskoho Derzhavnoho Ahrarno-Ekonomichnoho Universytetu, 3(2), 129–133. (in Ukrainian)
14. Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., Gaughan, J. B., Dunshea, F. R., & Lacetera, N. (2018). Review: Adaptation of animals to heat stress. Animal, 12, s431–s444. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731118001945
15. Broom, D. (2021). Farm animal welfare: A key component of the sustainability of farming systems. Veterinarski Glasnik, 75(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.2298/vetgl210514007b
16. Munoz, C., Campbell, A., Hemsworth, P., & Doyle, R. (2017). Animal-based measures to assess the welfare of extensively managed ewes. Animals, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8010002
17. María, G. A. (1995). Estimates of variances due to direct and maternal effects for reproductive traits of Romanov sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 18(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(95)00717-y
18. Tec Canché, J. E., Magaña Monforte, J. G., & Segura Correa, J. C. (2015). Environmental effects on productive and reproductive performance of Pelibuey ewes in Southeastern México. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 44(1), 508–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1102730
19. Kleemann, D. O., Walker, S. K., Ponzoni, R. W., Gifford, D. R., Walkley, J. R. W., Smith, D. H., Grimson, R. J., Jaensch, K. S., Walkom, S. F., & Brien, F. D. (2015). Effect of previous reproductive performance on current reproductive rate in South Australian Merino ewes. Animal Production Science, 56(4), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1071/an15114
20. Thomson, B. C., Smith, N. B., & Muir, P. D. (2021). Effect of birth rank and age at first lambing on lifetime performance and ewe efficiency. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 64(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2020.1745853
21. Kleemann, D. O., Lowe, A. M., & Weaver, A. C. (2026). Reproductive efficiency in sheep: Estimates and relationships with fertility, fecundity and lamb survival. Animals, 16(11), 1608. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111608
