Molecular basis of fertility variation in cryopreserved bull semen: Functional evaluation and expression analysis of IZUMO1, PLCζ, and CatSper genes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2026.29.02.26Keywords:
Bull semen cryopreservation, Gene expression, CatSper, IZUMO1, PLCζ, RT-qPCRAbstract
Semen cryopreservation serves as a pivotal biotechnological tool implemented in artificial insemination programs to accelerate genetic progress in cattle breeding. However, the freeze-thawing cycle can heavily compromise fertilization efficiency due to sublethal cellular, functional, and molecular injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of cryopreservation on conventional semen parameters and the relative transcript abundance of fertility-associated target genes (CatSper, IZUMO1, and PLCζ) utilizing straws from high-fertility and low-fertility breeding bulls. A retrospective cohort comprising 92 post-thaw semen samples (50 high-fertility and 42 low-fertility) was investigated. Sperm motility kinetics were quantified via Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA), while structural viability, plasma membrane integrity, and normal cytomorphology were determined using Eosin-Nigrosin exclusion, hypoosmotic swelling tests, and Diff-Quik staining, respectively. Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was executed to evaluate relative gene expression normalized against the reference gene GAPDH, based on the comparative 2−ΔΔCt methodology. The spermiogram analysis demonstrated a statistically significant downregulation in directional progressive motility (62.7 % vs. 65.4 %; P=0.011), structural viability (78.5 % vs. 80.2 %; P=0.045), and membrane permselectivity (72.2 % vs. 74.6 %; P=0.045) in the low-fertility group, accompanied by a suppression in normal sperm morphology (73.7 % vs. 78.1 %; P=0.0001). Conversely, overall total sperm motility displayed no significant statistical variance between the cohorts (74.0 % vs. 77.9 %; P=0.063). At the molecular level, all three target transcripts exhibited profound downregulations in the subfertile group: a 2.43-fold decrease for IZUMO1, a 2.78-fold decrease for PLCζ, and a 3.45-fold decrease for CatSper, establishing a distinct hierarchy of transcript instability (P<0.001). The study demonstrates that cryopreservation induces high transcript degradation that directly compromises flagellar hyperactivation, gamete fusion, and post-fertilization oocyte activation pathways. These findings suggest that integrating quantitative gene expression analysis with conventional spermiograms offers an invaluable diagnostic modality to diagnose cryptic male subfertility, optimize semen straw selection, and enhance reproductive efficiency in assisted breeding programs.
References
1. Nebel, R. L., & Jobst, S. M. (1998). Evaluation of systematic breeding programs for lactating dairy cows: A review. Journal of Dairy Science, 81(4), 1169–1174. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75679-6
2. Xie, Q., Jiang, X., Zhao, M., Xie, Y., Fan, Y., Suo, L., Kuang, Y. & (2024_. Effect of freezing and thawing on ejaculated sperm and subsequent pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in IVF. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 15, 1408662. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1408662
3. Vicente-Carrillo, A., Álvarez-Rodríguez, M., & Rodriguez- Martinez, H. (2023). The cation/calcium channel of sperm (CatSper): A common role played despite inter-species variation? International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(18), 13750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813750
4. Castro, M., Leal, K., Pezo, F., & Contreras, M. J. (2025). Sperm membrane: Molecular implications and strategies for cryopreservation in productive species. Animals, 15(12), 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15121808
5. Miller, C. M., Duong, S., Weaver, A. L., Zhao, Y., & Shenoy, C. C. (2021). Outcomes of frozen oocyte donor in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using fresh versus frozen sperm. Reproductive Sciences, 29(4), 1226–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00796-9
6. Saleh, A., Kashir, J., Thanassoulas, A., Safieh-Garabedian, B., Lai, F. A., & Nomikos, M. (2020). Essential role of sperm-specific PLC-zeta in egg activation and male factor infertility: An update. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 8, 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00028
7. World Health Organization. (2021). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (6th ed.). World Health Organization.
8. Kennedy, S. P., Spitzer, J. C., Hopkins, F. M., Higdon, H. L., & Bridges, W. C. (2002). Breeding soundness evaluations of 3648 yearling beef bulls using the 1993 Society for Theriogenology guidelines. Theriogenology, 58(5), 947–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00911-1
9. Van der Horst, G., & Maree, L. (2025). Assessment of sperm motility with the use of computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA). In M. Álvarez-Rodríguez (Ed.), Spermatology (pp. 219–234). Humana. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-4406-5_16
10. Ibrahim, M. A. (2024). Bull sperm cryopreservation: An overview on the current status and future perspectives. German Journal of Veterinary Research, 4(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.51585/gjvr.2024.1.0071
11. Chen, X., Wang, Y., Zhu, H., Hao, H., Zhao, X., Qin, T., & Wang, D. (2015). Comparative transcript profiling of gene expression of fresh and frozen–thawed bull sperm. Theriogenology, 83(4), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.015
12. Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods, 25(4), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
13. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
14. Bollwein, H., & Malama, E. (2023). Review: Evaluation of bull fertility. Functional and molecular approaches. Animal, 17, 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100795
15. Li, Y., Kalo, D., Zeron, Y., & Roth, Z. (2014). Progressive motility – a potential predictive parameter for semen fertilization capacity in bovines. Zygote, 24(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199414000720
16. Kaltsas, A. (2023). Oxidative stress and male infertility: The Protective role of antioxidants. Medicina, 59(10), 1769. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101769
17. Vincent, P., Underwood, S. L., Dolbec, C., Bouchard, N., Kroetsch, T., & Blondin, P. (2014). Bovine semen quality control in artificial insemination centers. In R. M. Hopper (Ed.), Bovine reproduction (pp. 685–695). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118833971.ch74
18. Ozimic, S., Ban-Frangez, H., & Stimpfel, M. (2023). Sperm cryopreservation today: Approaches, efficiency, and pitfalls. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45(6), 4716–4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060300
19. Ray, P. F., Toure, A., Metzler‐Guillemain, C., Mitchell, M. J., Arnoult, C., & Coutton, C. (2016). Genetic abnormalities leading to qualitative defects of sperm morphology or function. Clinical Genetics, 91(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12905
20. Hendri, H., Ananda, A., Damayanti, E., Sonjaya, H., Rosyada, Z. N. A., Lamid, M., Al Arif, M. A., Lokapirnasari, W. P., Hapila, A., Maulana, T., & Iskandar, H. (2026). Integrative functional and molecular characterization of Bali bull semen and its relationship with reproductive performance. Veterinary World, 19(4), 1447–1458. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2026.1447-1458
21. Khan, I. M., Cao, Z., Liu, H., Khan, A., Rahman, S. U., Khan, M. Z., Sathanawongs, A., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Impact of cryopreservation on spermatozoa freeze-thawed traits and relevance OMICS to assess sperm cryo-tolerance in farm animals. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 609180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.609180
22. Khan, M. Z., Chen, W., Naz, S., Liu, X., Liang, H., Chen, Y., Kou, X., Liu, Y., Ashraf, I., Han, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, C., & Zahoor, M. (2024). Determinant genetic markers of semen quality in livestock. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 15, 1456305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1456305
23. Hernández-Falcó, M., Sáez-Espinosa, P., López-Botella, A., Aizpurua, J., & Gómez-Torres, M. J. (2022). The role of sperm proteins IZUMO1 and TMEM95 in mammalian fertilization: A systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(7), 3929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073929
24. Wang, Y., Fu, X., & Li, H. (2025). Mechanisms of oxidative stress-induced sperm dysfunction. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 16, 1520835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1520835
25. Hachem, A., Godwin, J., Ruas, M., Lee, H. C., Ferrer Buitrago, M., Ardestani, G., Bassett, A., Fox, S., Navarrete, F., de Sutter, P., Heindryckx, B., Fissore, R., & Parrington, J. (2017). PLCζ is the physiological trigger of the Ca2+ oscillations that induce embryogenesis in mammals but conception can occur in its absence. Development, 144(16), 2914–2924. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.150227
26. Saito, T., Wada, I., & Inoue, N. (2019). Sperm IZUMO1-dependent gamete fusion influences male fertility in mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(19), 4809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194809
27. Shanaz, S., Hamadani, A., Firdous, S., Shah, R., Rather, M. A., Khan, N. N., & Ganai, N. A. (2022). CatSper genes and their role in male infertility: A review. SKUAST Journal of Research, 24(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-297x.2022.00047.2
