Comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in different countries regarding the production of bacteriophage preparations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2026.29.01.23

Keywords:

bacteriophages, phage therapy, veterinary medicinal products, regulatory framework, good manufacturing practice, pharmacopoeial standards

Abstract

The rise of antimicrobial resistance is one of the major global challenges in modern medicine and veterinary practice, necessitating the search for alternative or complementary antimicrobial approaches. Bacteriophages, as viruses that selectively infect bacteria, are considered promising agents for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections, particularly those caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Despite their significant therapeutic potential, the widespread implementation of phage-based products in clinical and veterinary practice is substantially limited by the lack of unified and clearly defined regulatory mechanisms governing their production, quality control, and use. The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the regulatory frameworks governing the manufacture and circulation of bacteriophage products in the European Union, the United States of America, and Ukraine, with a focus on identifying regulatory gaps and determining prospects for the development of legislation in the field of veterinary medicine. The study analyzed current legislative acts, regulatory authority guidelines, pharmacopoeial requirements, and contemporary scientific publications related to phage therapy and the biotechnological production of phage preparations. The results demonstrate that in all reviewed jurisdictions bacteriophages are regulated as biological medicinal products; however, approaches to their legal classification, good manufacturing practice requirements, pharmacopoeial standardization, and clinical evaluation differ significantly. In the European Union, wild-type bacteriophages are considered conventional medicinal products, whereas genetically modified phages may fall under the regulatory framework for advanced therapy medicinal products. In the United States, phage products are subject to centralized regulation as biological medicinal products, with the possibility of individualized use in exceptional clinical cases. In Ukraine, specialized regulatory provisions, pharmacopoeial standards, and distinct regulatory approaches for bacteriophage products are currently lacking. The findings highlight the need for the development and harmonization of national legislation based on international experience to ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of bacteriophage products and to establish a legal framework for their implementation in veterinary practice.

References

1. Perkiy, Yu., Kukhtyn, M., Boltyk, N., Klymyk, V., Rushchynska, T., Tykhonova, B., & Motkalyuk, N. (2026). Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance of pathogens of infectious dermatitis in dogs and cats in Ternopil. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 28 (121), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet12108

2. Kukhtyn, M., Malimon, Z., Salata, V., Rogalskyy, I., Gutyj, B., Kladnytska, L., Kravcheniuk, K., & Horiuk, Y. (2022). The effects of antimicrobial residues on microbiological content and the antibiotic resistance in frozen fish. World’s Veterinary Journal, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.54203/scil.2022.wvj47

3. Anand, T., Virmani, N., Bera, B. C., Vaid, R. K., Kumar, A., & Tripathi, B. N. (2020). Applications of personalised phage therapy highlighting the importance of bacteriophage banks against emerging antimicrobial resistance. Defence Life Science Journal, 5 (4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.14429/dlsj.5.15760

4. Punch, R., Azani, R., Ellison, C., Majury, A., Hynds, P. D., Payne, S. J., & Brown, R. S. (2025). The surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in wastewater from a one health perspective: A global scoping and temporal review (2014–2024). One Health, 21, 101139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101139

5. Horiuk, Y. V., Kukhtyn, M. D., Horiuk, V. V., Sytnik, V. A., & Dashkovskyy, O. O. (2021). Effect of phage SAvB14 combined with antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus variant bovis. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 12 (3), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.15421/022173

6. Horiuk, Y., Kukhtyn, M., Kernychnyi, S., Laiter-Moskaliuk, S., Prosyanyi, S., & Boltyk, N. (2021). Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus cultures of different biological origin to commercial bacteriophages and phages of Staphylococcus aureus var. bovis. Veterinary World, 1588–1593. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1588-1593

7. Verbeken, G., & Pirnay, J.-P. (2022). European regulatory aspects of phage therapy: magistral phage preparations. Current Opinion in Virology, 52, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2021.11.005

8. João, J., Lampreia, J., Prazeres, D. M. F., & Azevedo, A. M. (2021). Manufacturing of bacteriophages for therapeutic applications. Biotechnology Advances, 49, 107758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107758

9. Yevropeiskyi Parlament, & Rada Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. (2001). Dyrektyva Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu i Rady 2001/83/YeS vid 6 lystopada 2001 roku pro Kodeks Spivtovarystva shchodo likarskykh zasobiv, pryznachenykh dlia zastosuvannia liudynoiu [Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use]. Baza danykh "Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy" / Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_013-01#Text [in Ukrainian]

10. Yevropeiskyi Parlament, & Rada Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. (2001). Dyrektyva Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu i Rady 2001/18/YeS vid 12 bereznia 2001 roku pro navmysne vyvilnennia u dovkilla henetychno modyfikovanykh orhanizmiv ta pro skasuvannia Dyrektyvy Rady 90/220/YeES [Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC]. Baza danykh "Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy" / Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011-01#Text [in Ukrainian]

11. Yevropeiskyi Parlament, & Rada Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. (2009). Dyrektyva Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu i Rady 2009/41/YeS vid 6 travnia 2009 roku pro lokalizovane vykorystannia henetychno modyfikovanykh mikroorhanizmiv [Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms]. Baza danykh "Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy" / Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_012-09#Text [in Ukrainian]

12. Yevropeiskyi Parlament, & Rada Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. (2004). Dyrektyva Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu i Rady 2004/23/YeS vid 31 bereznia 2004 roku pro vstanovlennia standartiv yakosti ta bezpechnosti dlia donatsii, zahotivli, testuvannia, pereroblennia, konservatsii, zberihannia ta realizatsii liudskykh tkanyn i klityn [Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells]. Baza danykh "Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy" / Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_001-04#Text [in Ukrainian]

13. Pirnay, J.-P., Verbeken, G., Ceyssens, P.-J., Huys, I., De Vos, D., Ameloot, C., & Fauconnier, A. (2018). The magistral phage. Viruses, 10 (2), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10020064

14. Faltus, T. (2024). The Medicinal Phage – regulatory roadmap for phage therapy under EU pharmaceutical legislation. Viruses, 16 (3), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16030443

15. Álvarez, B., & Biosca, E. G. (2025). Harnessing the activity of lytic bacteriophages to foster the Sustainable Development Goals and the “One Health” strategy. Viruses, 17 (4), 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17040549

16. Yevropeiskyi Parlament, & Rada Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. (2007). Dyrektyva Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu i Rady 2004/23/YeS vid 31 bereznia 2004 roku pro vstanovlennia standartiv yakosti ta bezpechnosti dlia donatsii, zahotivli, testuvannia, pereroblennia, konservatsii, zberihannia ta realizatsii liudskykh tkanyn i klityn [Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004]. Baza danykh "Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy" / Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a28#Text [in Ukrainian]

17. European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC [32014R0536]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/536/oj/eng

18. European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on veterinary medicinal products and repealing Directive 2001/82/EC [32019R0006]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/6/oj/eng

19. Council of Europe. (2023). Public consultation on new general chapter on phage therapy active substances and medicinal products for human and veterinary use in Pharmeuropa 35.2. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare. https://www.edqm.eu/en/about-edqm/-/asset_publisher/wQwK2Umbt4vx/content/public-consultation-on-new-general-chapter-on-phage-therapy-active-substances-and-medicinal-products-for-human-and-veterinary-use-in-pharmeuropa-35.2

20. Berryhill, B. A., Gil-Gil, T., Smith, A. P., & Levin, B. R. (2025). The future of phage therapy in the USA. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 31 (11), 982–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2025.03.013

21. Kline, A., Cobián Güemes, A. G., Yore, J., Ghose, C., Van Tyne, D., Whiteson, K., & Pride, D. T. (2025). Current clinical laboratory challenges to widespread adoption of phage therapy in the United States. Antibiotics, 14 (6), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060553

22. Moon, K., Coxon, C., Årdal, C., Botgros, R., Djebara, S., Durno, L., Fiore, C. R., Perrin, J.-B., Dixon, D. M., & Cavaleri, M. (2025). Considerations and perspectives on phage therapy from the transatlantic taskforce on antimicrobial resistance. Nature Communications, 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64608-3

23. Niazi, S. K. (2025). Bacteriophage therapy: Discovery, development, and FDA approval pathways. Pharmaceuticals, 18 (8), 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081115

24. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (1996). Zakon Ukrainy "Pro likarski zasoby" No. 123/96-VR [Law of Ukraine "On Medicinal Products" No. 123/96-VR]. Baza danykh "Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy" https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/123/96-вр#Text

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Horiuk, Y., & Rudyk, H. (2026). Comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in different countries regarding the production of bacteriophage preparations. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 29(1), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2026.29.01.23