Assessment of Brovitacoccid efficacy against Eimeria spp. in naturally infected broiler chickens

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2026.29.02.15

Keywords:

Eimeria, Amprolium hydrochloride, anemia, treatment, effectiveness, broiler chickens

Abstract

Chicken coccidiosis remains one of the most prevalent and economically significant parasitic diseases in industrial poultry production, linked to impaired productivity, metabolic disturbances, intestinal damage, and substantial economic losses. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of the veterinary medicinal product “Brovitacoccid” (Brovafarma LLC) in broiler chickens naturally infected with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima. The aim was to determine the anticoccidial efficacy of this product based on clinical, parasitological, pathological, haematological, and biochemical parameters, and to justify its use for the prevention and treatment of chicken coccidiosis. The investigation was conducted in 2025 on 48 broiler chickens aged 14–16 days, naturally infected with Eimeria spp., under the production conditions of “U Farming Group” LLC (Zhytomyr region, Ukraine). The disease was characterised by pronounced clinical signs, anaemia, disturbances in protein metabolism, and severe pathological lesions in the intestine. Administration of the product at a dosage of 2 g/L of drinking water for seven consecutive days resulted in a statistically significant reduction in infection intensity: by day 14, the oocyst count had decreased to 7.3±0.9 thousand/g of faeces, and by day 28, the reduction in oocyst shedding reached 83.8 % compared to the control group. The prevalence of infection in the treated group dropped to 4.3 %, whereas it remained high in untreated birds. Treatment with “Brovitacoccid” was associated with marked clinical improvement, including reduced diarrhoea, enhanced appetite, and increased activity of the birds. The treated group showed lower mortality (4.2 % vs. 20.8 % in the control group), higher flock survival (95.8 % vs. 79.2 %), and significantly higher body weight gain. Hematological and biochemical analyses revealed a marked normalization of parameters on day 28 of the experiment: red blood cell count (2.7±0.15 ×10¹²/L, p<0.05), white blood cell count (19.3±0.9 ×10⁹/L, p<0.05), hemoglobin content (106.2±3.1 g/L, p<0.05), total protein level (38.4±1.1 g/L, p<0.05), and alkaline phosphatase activity (135.6±8.4 U/L, p<0.05). These findings indicate restoration of homeostasis and attenuation of the inflammatory response. Pathological examination confirmed less severe intestinal lesions in treated chickens. These findings demonstrate the high therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of “Brovitacoccid”, confirm its safety for poultry, and support its use in industrial poultry farming and support its use in industrial poultry farming, offering a cost-effective strategy for coccidiosis control.

References

1. Blake, D. P., Knox, J., Dehaeck, B., Huntington, B., Rathinam, T., Ravipati, V., Ayoade, S., Gilbert, W., Adebambo, A. O., Jatau, I. D., Raman, M., Parker, D., Rushton, J., & Tomley, F. M. (2020). Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Veterinary Research, 51(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-020-00837-2

2. Bohach, M. V., & Skalchuk, V. V. (2018). Porivnialna otsinka efektyvnosti Brovitakok-tsydu ta zasobu "Amprolev-Plius" za zmishanoho perebihu kryptosporydiozu ta eimeriozu teliat [Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of Brovitacoc-cid and the product "Amprolev-Plus" in a mixed course of cryptosporidiosis and eimeriosis in calves]. Visnyk Sumskoho Natsionalnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Veterynarna Medytytsina, (1), 133–135. (in Ukrainian)

3. Chapman, H. D. (1997). Biochemical, genetic and applied aspects of drug resistance in Eimeria parasites of the fowl. Avian Pathology, 26(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459708419208

4. Dalloul, R. A., & Lillehoj, H. S. (2006). Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development. Expert Review of Vaccines, 5(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.5.1.143

5. Debbou-Iouknane, N., Benbarek, H., & Ayad, A. (2018). Prevalence and aetiology of coccidiosis in broiler chickens in Bejaia province, Algeria. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 85(1), a1590. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v85i1.1590w

6. El-Shall, N. A., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Albaqami, N. M., Khafaga, A. F., Taha, A. E., Swelum, A. A., El-Saadony, M. T., Salem, H. M., El-Tahan, A. M., AbuQamar, S. F., El- Tarabily, K. A., & Elbestawy, A. R. (2022). Phytochemical control of poultry coccidiosis: A review. Poultry Science, 101(1), 101542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101542

7. Fatoba, A. J., & Adeleke, M. A. (2018). Diagnosis and control of chicken coccidiosis: a recent update. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 42(4), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-018-1048-1

8. Chalalai, T., Promsut, W., Hinkhao, K., Hengphrathani, T., Sangsakul, K., Bhavabhutanon, N., & Nonkookhetkhong, T. (2025). Effects of probiotics and amprolium on performance, lesion scores, oocyst shedding, and histopathological changes in Eimeria tenella-infected broiler chickens. Veterinary World, 8(6), 1400–1410. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.1400-1410

9. Giannenas, I., Florou-Paneri, P., Papazahariadou, M., Christaki, E., Botsoglou, N. A., & Spais, A. B. (2003). Effect of dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on performance of broilers after experimental infection with Eimeria tenella. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 57(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003942031000107299

10. Gutyj, B., Stybel, V., Hariv, I., Maksymovych, I., Buczek, K., Staniec, M., Milczak, A., Bushueva, I., Kulish, S., Shcherbyna, R., & Samura, T. (2019). Influence of Amprolinsile and Brovitacoccid on the protein synthesizing function of the liver and enzyme activity in turkey blood serum during Eimeria invasion. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 10(2), 723–729.

11. Kharyv, I. I. (2011). Vplyv brovitakoktsydu ta plodiv roztoropshi plamiastoi na morfolohichni pokaznyky krovi intaktnykh indykiv [The influence of brovitacoccides and fruits of thistle on morphological parameters of blood of intact turkeys]. Naukovo-Tekhnichnyi Biuleten Instytutu Biolohii Tvaryn i DNDKI Vetpreparativ ta Kormovykh Dobavok, 12(3–4), 239–243. (in Ukrainian)

12. Huang, Y., Ruan, X., Li, L., & Zeng, M. (2017). Prevalence of Eimeria species in domestic chickens in Anhui province, China. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 41(4), 1014–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-017-0927-1

13. Kadykalo, S., Roberts, T., Thompson, M., Wilson, J., Lang, M., & Espeisse, O. (2018). The value of anticoccidials for sustainable global poultry production. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 51(3), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.09.004

14. Kotcumbas, I. Y., Bisyuk, I. Yu., Gorzheyev, V. M., Malyk, O. G., Zhila, M. I., Kosenko, Yu. M., Chajkovska, O. I., Muzika, V. P., Kotcumbas, G. I., Paterega, I. P., Mazurkevich, A. J., Levickij, T. R., Brezvin, O. M., Kushnir, I. M., Perig, Zh. M., & Ivaniv, M. I. (2013). Klinichni doslidzhennya veterinarnih preparativ ta kormovih dobavok: Monografiya [Clinical trials of veterinary drugs and feed additives: Monograph]. TOV «Vidavnichij dim «SAM». (in Ukrainian)

15. Kruchynenko, O. V. (2021). Spreading of hen gastrointestinal parasitoses. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 3, 236–241. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2021.03.29

16. Mathis, G. F., Lumpkins, B., Cervantes, H. M., Fitz-Coy, S. H., Jenkins, M. C., Jones, M. K., Price, K. R., & Dalloul, R. A. (2025). Coccidiosis in poultry: Disease mechanisms, control strategies, and future directions. Poultry Science, 104(5), 104663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104663

17. Soares Júnior, J. C., Itoyama, B. F., Beretta, B. M. S., Hossotani, C. M. d. S., Silva, M. S. C., Silva, G. S. d., Nakamura, A. A., Lopes, F. L., & Meireles, M. V. (2023). Identification of Eimeria spp. in domestic chickens raised in alternative poultry production systems in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 32(4), e011123. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612023075

18. Stybel, V., Gutyj, B., Hariv, I., Slivinska, L., & Prijma, O. (2019). Effect of “Amprolinsyl” and “Amprolium 22%” on morphological indices of blood of turkeys for eumeria invasion. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 21(94), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet9429

19. Taylor, J., Walk, C., Misiura, M., Sorbara, J.-O. B., Giannenas, I., & Kyriazakis, I. (2022). Quantifying the effect of coccidiosis on broiler performance and infection outcomes in the presence and absence of control methods. Poultry Science, 101(4), 101746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101746

20. Vilienė, V., Racevičiūtė-Stupelienė, A., Murawska, D., Gesek, M., Matusevičius, P., Miknienė, Z., & Nutautaitė, M. (2024). Evaluation of herbal anticoccidials on growth performance in experimentally infected broiler chickens. Agriculture, 14(12), 2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122261

21. Williams, R. B. (2002). Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: Pathways to success. Avian Pathology, 31(4), 317–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450220148988

Published

2026-09-12

How to Cite

Feshchenko, D., Dovhiy, Y., Berezovskyi, A., & Zghozinska, O. (2026). Assessment of Brovitacoccid efficacy against Eimeria spp. in naturally infected broiler chickens. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 29(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.31210/spi2026.29.02.15